langreiter.com plain, simple: comment-2002-08-02-4

LANGREITER.COM plain, simple

START

INDEX

comment-2002-08-02-4

CREATED BY David Ness • LAST EDITED BY David Ness 8245 days AGO

Thanks for the information. It raises two follow-up questions. One is on `dating' articles. AFAICS the only date I am seeing must be `today' and must be automatically generated. I can't find anyplace obvious that tells me anything about when an article was written. In a field as volitale as ours is, something even a few months old, might as well have been written in a previous millenium (when Saylor was worth $15billion or so). `Good Press' sources should be careful to `date' the articles.

The second point is that your `dating' the article helps me understand just how bad the journalists are in this field. Apparently this was written a quarter or so ago, and the journalists bought the `we;re back on track' spiel wholesale. Since that time the Market Cap has apparently been cut to
1/4 of what it was, and they are now engineering a `reverse split' to keep the stock from being delisted.

Anyway, thanks for the information. It adds to `the story'.