LANGREITER.COM plain, simple
      START     INDEX
  Donnerstag, 23. August 2007
Nicholas Carr: Rise of the wikicrats

As indicated by Aaron Swartz's research (see Who writes Wikipedia?), there seem to be two rather distinct groups of Wikipedia editors: Contributors of original material (often subject-matter experts) and "worker bees"/homogenizers, who mostly make sure that an article fits well into the general framework (fix spelling mistakes, ensure format consistency, add info boxes, place articles in categories &c.; in short: perform quality assurance) and often contribute little if any original information. Both roles are, of course, essential.

Wikipedia as a resource of planet-wide importance stands to lose a lot, though, when, as seems to happen again and again, quality assurance folks question the relevance of articles in fields of knowledge they simply have no clue about; and worse, if little or no research is performed prior to scheduling articles for deletion, under the banner of the innocuous-seeming one-word question: "Relevance?"

Really: Who are you to judge?

As the case of, e.g., Antville suggests, the burden of proof currently lies with people who deem entries relevant; shouldn't it be the other way round?
motz 6299 days AGO
it seems they ran into a problem best known from old media chaps: if the editor in chief doesn't stay up late, topics easily get the "nah, not of my interest and therefore of nobody else"-flag. you may lenghten their attention span with cynism. circle closed.
chris 6298 days AGO
I have hope that the Wikipedians fix it; yet I continue to wonder what the motivation for such trigger-happiness is in a non-space-constrained medium ...
chris 6298 days AGO
btw: coating with cynicism or directing the latter at those chaps?
motz 6297 days AGO
oh, how you like it ... depending on the grade of doggedness you face?
Please log in (you may want to register first) to post comments!
  SEARCH

GET YOUR MOVE ON

  ALMOST ALL ABOUT YOU
So log in, fella — or finally get your langreiter.com account. You always wanted one.
Nearby in the temporal dimension:
Nobody.
... and 87 of the anonymous kind.
Click on Join us in the chatterbox dimension! for a moderate dose of lcom-talk. This will probably not work in Lynx and other browser exotica.

THIS DAY IN HISTORY
2007 / 2006 / 2005 / 2004 / 2003 / 2002

BACKLINKS
none

RECENT EDITS (MORE)
  films-seen
  Blood Stone
  y!kes
  wet towel
  B Studio
  Pilcrow News
  Nastassja Kinski
  2011-10-06-steve
  2011-10-06
  comment-2011-08-04-1
POWERED BY
Special Entanglement Forces provided by Vanilla

&c.
GeoURL RSS 0.92

FRIENDLY SHOPS
Uncut Games bei Gameware

OFFEN!
Offenlegung gem. §25 MedienG:
Christian Langreiter, Langkampfen
See also: Privacy policy.


 
EDIT